Scientific Magazine - Search News

Scientific American magazine faces criticism after Kamala Harris endorsement: 'Very problematic'

The Scientific American magazine faced backlash on Monday after it announced that it was endorsing Democratic nominee Kamala Harris in the 2024 presidential race. The outlet also slammed Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump.

The Independent on MSN · 3d

Scientific American makes presidential endorsement for only the second time in its 179-year history

Scientific American makes presidential endorsement for only the second time in its 179-year history - ‘The US faces two futures,’ according to editors at top science magazine

BizPac Review · 3d

Scientific American mag slammed for rare presidential endorsement and criticism of Trump: ‘Very problematic’

Scientific American magazine made its second presidential endorsement in its history, backing Vice President Kamala Harris.

Acsh.org · 4d

Scientific American Endorses Kamala Harris. Here's Why That's a Good Thing

Scientific American urged readers to "Vote for Kamala Harris to Support Science, Health and the Environment." It's a senseless, shortsighted move that will inflame America's disdain for science. The upside is that it could incentivize needed reforms in our ideologically slanted academic and public health institutions.

Historic Move: Leading Science Magazine Breaks 179-Year Tradition with Presidential Endorsement for This Candidate

Scientific American has endorsed Kamala Harris for president, highlighting her commitment to science, healthcare, and climate ...

The Atlantic on MSN3d

Scientific American Didn’t Need to Endorse Anybody

This is an edition of The Atlantic Daily, a newsletter that guides you through the biggest stories of the day, helps you discover new ideas, and recommends the best in culture. Sign up for it here.

4dOpinion

The Political Scientific American

A very unscientific Harris endorsement shows why voters don’t trust scientific elites.

Media Matters for America2d

OutKick's Clay Travis: “The history of science, if you study it, is actually of scientists being incredibly wrong about almost everything”

Go back and study history, this is the truth. So I'm actually skeptical any time science lines up and says this is the answer, you cannot challenge it. I think we need robust uninhibited debate.

Smithsonian Magazine on MSN1d

‘The Starry Night’ Accurately Depicts a Scientific Theory That Wasn’t Described Until Years After van Gogh’s Death

Researchers say that the iconic painting's swirling sky lines up with Kolmogorov's theory of turbulence, suggesting that the ...

Scientific American4d

Hidden Patterns Show Nobel Prize Science Trends

By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoverie As Nobel season ...

Opinion

4dOpinion

‘The science’ is getting political again

What Scientific American is doing is a disgrace. When the last shreds of its credibility disappear and its readership inevitably declines, it will have only itself to blame.

Results that may be inaccessible to you are currently showing.

Hide inaccessible results